Domination in African National Football Kit Sponsorship: A Strategic Analysis and Opportunity

By 

Wycliffe W. Njororai Simiyu, Professor and Chair, Kinesiology and Health Science, Stephen F. Austin State University and serves as Director for Research at Enda Inc.

Introduction

The landscape of national football team kit sponsorship in Africa is a dynamic and multifaceted arena. As a crucial source of revenue and brand exposure for national federations, these partnerships are highly sought after. While the market is competitive, a few global giants consistently dominate, with their strategies and resources setting the benchmark for the industry. However, the presence of smaller, local brands and the unique characteristics of the African football market present opportunities for new players. This article will analyze which brands dominate kit sponsorship for national soccer teams in Africa, the factors that influence the selection of a sponsor, and the strategic pathways for a new entrant like Enda Sportswear to become a significant player in this landscape.

Dominant Brands in African Football Kit Sponsorship

An analysis of major African football tournaments, such as the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON), reveals a clear pattern of dominance by a select few global sportswear brands. The most significant players are Puma, Nike, and Adidas, collectively referred to as the "big three". 

  • Puma: The German sportswear brand has long been a dominant force in African football. Their strategy has focused on securing many partnerships with top-tier African teams, often with a long-term commitment, as well as partnering with the Confederation of African Football as a technical partner. For instance, Puma has sponsored major footballing nations such as Ghana, Senegal, and Morocco, and its kits have been worn by several AFCON champions.  Their consistent presence and investment have earned them a reputation as a leading brand in the region.

  • Nike: The American sportswear giant, Nike, has a strong and strategic presence in African football. While they may not sponsor the highest number of teams, their partnerships are often with high-profile nations that have a significant global following, such as Nigeria. The Super Eagles' kits, designed by Nike, have often been lauded for their unique and culturally inspired designs, becoming iconic symbols that transcend the sport and generate massive commercial success.

  • Adidas: Adidas also maintains a strong presence, particularly with a historical powerhouse like Algeria. The brand’s global reputation and history in football make it an attractive partner for federations seeking to align themselves with an established and reputable brand.

The dominance of the big three is also evident at the men’s Football World Cup for the past three editions, 2014, 2018 and 2022 as seen in the table below:



2022 World Cup

2018 World Cup

2014 World Cup

Total number of teams

32

32

32


Total number of brands


9


8


8


Brands (number of teams – %)

Nike (13 – 41%)

Adidas (12 – 38%)

Nike (10 – 32%)

 

Adidas (7 – 22%)

Nike (10 – 32%)

Adidas (9 – 28%)

 

Puma (6 – 19%)

Puma (4 – 12%)

Puma (8 – 25%)

 

Hummel (1 – 3%)


New Balance (2 – 6%)

Burrda (1 – 3%)

 


Kappa (1 – 3%)


Erreà (1 – 3%)

Joma (1 – 3%)

 

Majid (1 – 3%)

Hummel (1 – 3%)

Lotto (1 – 3%)

 


Marathon (1 – 3%)


Uhlsport (1 – 3%)


Marathon (1 – 3%)

 


New Balance (1 – 3%)

Umbro(1 – 3%)

Uhlsport (1 – 3%)



One All Sports (1 – 3%)



While these three brands dominate the top tier, other brands like Umbro, Macron, and Kappa also secure partnerships, often with teams that are not in the top rankings. This illustrates a tiered market, where a handful of global brands compete for the most prominent teams, while a wider array of smaller brands vies for the rest. It is instructive that the five African representatives at the 2022 World Cup were kitted thus, Cameroon (One All Sports), Ghana (Puma), Morocco (Puma), Senegal (Puma) and Tunisia (Kappa). Puma, therefore dominates the African market compared to the other big two, Nike and Adidas. This was evident at the 2024 African Cup of Nations in Cote D’Ivoire where Puma were kit sponsors for six countries including the hosts who eventually won the tournament, Senegal, Guinea, Ghana, Egypt and Morocco. Next to Puma, was Umbro that sponsored two teams, Namibia and DR Congo. All the other nations had a different sponsor including Kappa (Tunisia), KoPa (Zambia, Viper Sportswear (Mozambique), One All Sports (Cameroon), Adidas (Algeria), AB Sports (Mauritania), Macron (Equatorial Guinea), Sandaland (Tanzania), Saller (Gambia), Le Coq Sportif (South Africa), Lacatoni (Angola), Tempo (Cape Verde), Nike (Nigeria), Guisport (Guinea Bissau, Tovio (Burkina Faso, and Airness (Mali). The African football kit sponsorship market is diverse and dominated by local rather than global brands.

Factors Influencing the Selection of Kit Sponsors 

The decision-making process for national football teams in selecting a kit sponsor is complex and influenced by a variety of factors. These can be broadly categorized into commercial, performance-based, and image-related criteria. 

  1. Financial and Commercial Factors: 

  1. Financial Resources: The most direct and critical factor is the monetary offer. National federations often seek partners that can provide a substantial cash injection to fund their operations, including player salaries, travel, and infrastructure development. The financial stability and brand power of a sponsor are key considerations. 

  1. Commercial Opportunities: Beyond a flat fee, teams look for sponsors that can offer additional commercial benefits, such as a percentage of merchandise sales, marketing and promotional support, and access to new markets. A global brand like Nike or Adidas offers unparalleled distribution channels and marketing reach. 

  1. Performance and Image-Based Factors: 

  1. Team Performance and Brand Image: A national team's on-field success and public image are crucial. Sponsors are attracted to winning teams and those with a positive reputation. A star player, a strong fan base, and a team's potential to qualify for major tournaments like the World Cup are all significant draws. 

  1. Brand Fit and Association: Both the team and the brand consider the "fit" of the partnership. A brand's image and values must align with those of the national team. For example, a brand with a strong focus on sustainability might be a good fit for a team that has a strong environmental message. 

  1. Global Exposure: National teams from Africa often seek to raise their global profile. Sponsoring a team provides a brand with direct access to a huge audience during international tournaments, making it a valuable marketing tool. 

  1. Local and Environmental Factors: 

  1. Socio-Political Stability: Political and economic stability in a country can influence a brand's decision to invest. Issues such as political instability, government regulations, and taxation can pose risks for long-term sponsorship deals. 

  2. Local Market and Fan Base: Brands also consider the size and purchasing power of the local market. A large, passionate fan base with disposable income is highly attractive to a potential sponsor. The ability of a sponsor to engage with this fan base through grassroots initiatives and local events is a key factor. 

Enda Sportswear's Strategic Path to a Breakthrough

For a brand like Enda Sportswear, a recent entrant with a unique identity and mission, competing directly with the global giants is not a viable strategy. Instead, Enda must leverage its unique strengths and adopt a targeted, long-term approach to become a significant player in the African football landscape.

  1. Embrace Authenticity and Cultural Narrative:

    1. Enda's greatest asset is its authenticity as a Kenyan brand. Its name, "Enda," means "Go!" in Swahili, and its identity is deeply intertwined with Kenya's running heritage. This authenticity can be a powerful differentiator. Enda should sponsor a national team that also has a strong local identity and a story that resonates with a wider audience.

    2. Instead of competing on financial terms, Enda should focus on creating kit designs that are not just functional but are rich in cultural symbolism. These designs can tell a story about the team, its history, and its people, creating an emotional connection that larger, more generic brands cannot replicate.

  2. Focus on Niche Markets and Grassroots Initiatives:

    1. Enda should initially target national teams and clubs that are not the primary focus of the big three. This could include women's national teams, which have a rapidly growing fan base, or youth national teams.

    2. Partnering with and supporting grassroots football academies and community clubs would be a powerful strategy. By investing in the development of young talent and providing them with quality, locally-made kits, Enda can build brand loyalty from the ground up and establish itself as a brand that is genuinely committed to the future of African football.

  3. Leverage its Social and Ethical Mission:

    1. Enda is committed to ethical and sustainable production of its products. This is a powerful selling point in a market where consumers are increasingly conscious of a brand's social and environmental impact.

    2. Enda should prominently market its ethical supply chain and its contribution to the local economy. This resonates with a new generation of African consumers who are proud to support local businesses and who want to see their purchases have a positive social impact.

  4. Strategic Partnerships and Digital Storytelling:

    1. Rather than a blanket sponsorship of a major team, Enda can partner with individual African football stars who align with its values of community and social good. These athletes can serve as brand ambassadors, connecting the brand to a wider audience.

    2. Enda should use digital platforms to share its brand story, featuring not just the athletes, but also the designers, manufacturers, and communities behind the products. This content-driven approach can build a powerful and engaged online community, turning a sponsorship into a movement.

Conclusion

The kit sponsorship market for African national football teams is dominated by global sportswear giants like Puma, Nike, and Adidas, who leverage their financial power, brand reputation, and global reach to secure high-profile partnerships. The selection of a sponsor is a complex decision, influenced by financial incentives, a team’s performance, and brand image alignment. For a new entrant like Enda Sportswear, direct competition is not a viable strategy. Instead, Enda can carve out a significant presence by leveraging its unique authenticity, ethical mission, and deep cultural connection to Africa. By focusing on targeted sponsorships, grassroots initiatives, and powerful digital storytelling, Enda can become a brand that not only provides kits but also embodies the passion, pride, and potential of African football, creating a model for a new generation of sports business. 

By 

Wycliffe W. Njororai Simiyu, Professor and Chair, Kinesiology and Health Science, Stephen F. Austin State University and serves as Director for Research at Enda Inc.